Springe direkt zu Inhalt

Prof. Dr. Bettina Rentsch, LL.M. (Michigan)

IMG_2969

Assistant Professor for European Private Law, Conflict of Laws and Comparative Law

Professor

Address
Boltzmannstraße 3
14195 Berlin
Office
Michelle Piosik

Bettina Rentsch is a tenure-track Assistant Professor at Freie Universität Berlin, where she teaches Private International Law, Comparative Law, and German Civil Law and selected issues of Law and social theory.

Her research in Private International Law focuses on the interplay between International Family Law and European Law, the intersections between Public and Private International Law, the theoretical foundations of Private International Law and its potential for social theory. She has authored a book on the concept of habitual residence in European Private International Law and several articles on conceptual challenges to harmonising Private International Law on the European Union Level.

Bettina holds a First State Exam in Law from the State of Baden-Württemberg ('13), a doctoral degree in Law from the University of Heidelberg ('16), a Master of Laws from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (LL.M. '16) and a bar exam equivalent from the Higher Regional Court of Berlin ('19). She practised law at the German law firm Hengeler Mueller with a focus on Dispute Resolution and Corporate Law and was an Academic Visitor at the University of Oxford's Harris Manchester College in 2023.

Publications

Independent publications

Habitual residence in the European conflict of laws system, Studies in foreign and international private law, Volume 382, Mohr Siebeck 2017, 465 + XXXII pages

Reviews:

  1. RabelsZ 83 (2019), 880 – 886 (Dietmar Baetge)
  2. IPRax 2/2018
  3. Conflict of Laws (November 2017) (Giesela Rühl)

Political statements, studies (published)

Publications

Contributions to journals and anthologies

Blog posts and editorials

Commentaries

  • [in preparation] Articles 1-13, 89-101 CISG, in: Stefan Grundmann (ed.), Staub's Commentary on the German Commercial Code, Volume 10
  • Articles 4, 21 EuErbVO, in: Thomas Raff (ed.), J. von Staudinger's Commentary on the Civil Code with Introductory Act and Ancillary Laws
  • Rome III RegulationArt. 17 (with appendix), 17a, 46e EGBGB and Art. 229 § 28 EGBGB, in: Franz-Jürgen Säcker, Hartmut Oetker, Bettina Limpberg (eds.), Munich Commentary on the Civil Code, Volumes 12 and 13 (from the 9th edition 2023/2024)
  • Art. 13 EGBGB, in: Christine Budzikiewicz/Marc-Philippe Weller/Wolfgang Wurmnest (eds.), Beck's Online Commentary on Private International Law, Munich 2015, 14th edition dated 1 October 2024

Educational literature

Reviews

Smaller contributions

  • Commentary on ECJ, judgment of 28 April 2022 – C-319/20 – Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, formerly Facebook Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV, EuZW 2022, 522 (together with Maren Vogel)
  • Commentary on ECJ, judgment of 18 July 2020, C-80/19 – E./ E, LMK 2021, 437104
  • Jurisdiction for actions for damages in connection with the sinking of the ferry Al Salam Boccaccio'98, EuZW 2020, 898 (together with Lisa-Sophie Wollschläger)
  • Federal Court of Justice, IV ZB 20+21/18, LMK 2019, 417109 
  • Hamburg Higher Regional Court: Lack of language skills as a reason for joint guardianship, NZFam 2017, 1161
  • ECJ, Case C-111/17 PPU – OL v. PQ, FamRZ 2017, 1506–1511
  • Munich Higher Regional Court, 22 March 2017: Local jurisdiction and negative conflict of competence in probate proceedings, ZEV 2017, 333
  • Federal Court of Justice, 20 July 2016: Determination of the name in the case of a same-sex marriage concluded abroad, NZFam 2016, 1031-1033
  • Determination of jurisdiction in cases of legal kidnapping abroad, NZFam 2016, 576
  • Time limit and grounds in HKÜ proceedings, NZFam 2016, 83
  • No perpetuatio fori in custody proceedings when the child moves to a third country, NZFam 2015, 474